<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technology predictions for the next 10 years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bearfruit.org/2010/01/04/technology-predictions-for-the-next-10-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bearfruit.org/2010/01/04/technology-predictions-for-the-next-10-years/</link>
	<description>Matthew Nuzum&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy James Sobotka</title>
		<link>http://www.bearfruit.org/2010/01/04/technology-predictions-for-the-next-10-years/comment-page-1/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy James Sobotka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 23:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-791</guid>
		<description>A pretty interesting post from someone that I&#039;d expect no less from.

My only bone of contention might be your final prediction. Let&#039;s just play history games...

Thirty years ago, how many computing devices  were in your average household?
Twenty years ago, how many computing devices?
Ten years ago?
Five?
Two?
One?

I think you are perhaps avoiding historical context here. As a guess, I&#039;d bet we could see one to two desktop computers, a netbook, three portable devices (Browser enabled device), and three cellular portable devices per household right now? Assuming a family of say, four people with teens and above?

When we wonder about needs however, what roles does big content currently hold? If Avatar was any indication, let&#039;s assume moderate to large. That said, we have one distribution system that clearly trumps all others (In spite of some serious players such as Amazon.)

_IF_ big content plays a sizable role (and I believe it does, as well as having a sizable chunk of economics supporting the theory), then Free Software is rapidly running the risk of becoming moot.

This isn&#039;t about browsers any more. This is about Kindles, iTunes, and Steam.

Great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A pretty interesting post from someone that I&#8217;d expect no less from.</p>
<p>My only bone of contention might be your final prediction. Let&#8217;s just play history games&#8230;</p>
<p>Thirty years ago, how many computing devices  were in your average household?<br />
Twenty years ago, how many computing devices?<br />
Ten years ago?<br />
Five?<br />
Two?<br />
One?</p>
<p>I think you are perhaps avoiding historical context here. As a guess, I&#8217;d bet we could see one to two desktop computers, a netbook, three portable devices (Browser enabled device), and three cellular portable devices per household right now? Assuming a family of say, four people with teens and above?</p>
<p>When we wonder about needs however, what roles does big content currently hold? If Avatar was any indication, let&#8217;s assume moderate to large. That said, we have one distribution system that clearly trumps all others (In spite of some serious players such as Amazon.)</p>
<p>_IF_ big content plays a sizable role (and I believe it does, as well as having a sizable chunk of economics supporting the theory), then Free Software is rapidly running the risk of becoming moot.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t about browsers any more. This is about Kindles, iTunes, and Steam.</p>
<p>Great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
