<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: At a glance credibility &#8211; link to content ratio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bearfruit.org/2009/01/16/at-a-glance-credibility-link-to-content-ratio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bearfruit.org/2009/01/16/at-a-glance-credibility-link-to-content-ratio/</link>
	<description>Matthew Nuzum&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:24:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2-bleeding</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://www.bearfruit.org/2009/01/16/at-a-glance-credibility-link-to-content-ratio/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Basically if the site is all links, it has no credibility for me. If the site has some content on the other hand I might be fooled for a second, but it just depends. What I usually look for to determine if it&#039;s a squatter site is whether all of the content is just about the same or if it has one keyword that&#039;s displayed over and over throughout the page - these are dead giveaways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically if the site is all links, it has no credibility for me. If the site has some content on the other hand I might be fooled for a second, but it just depends. What I usually look for to determine if it&#8217;s a squatter site is whether all of the content is just about the same or if it has one keyword that&#8217;s displayed over and over throughout the page &#8211; these are dead giveaways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.bearfruit.org/2009/01/16/at-a-glance-credibility-link-to-content-ratio/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-195</guid>
		<description>I never take time to read the links :-)
if I hadn&#039;t recognized Yahoo! as a brand name I wouldn&#039;t skip that page instantly.
For me the ads/text ratio is also important. Large ads hurts credibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never take time to read the links <img src='http://www.bearfruit.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
if I hadn&#8217;t recognized Yahoo! as a brand name I wouldn&#8217;t skip that page instantly.<br />
For me the ads/text ratio is also important. Large ads hurts credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.bearfruit.org/2009/01/16/at-a-glance-credibility-link-to-content-ratio/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-236</guid>
		<description>[mpt (Matthew Paul Thomas)](http://twitter.com/mpt) suggested this document from Stanford on this very subject. Perfect: [http://credibility.stanford.edu/guidelines/](http://credibility.stanford.edu/guidelines/)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[mpt (Matthew Paul Thomas)](http://twitter.com/mpt) suggested this document from Stanford on this very subject. Perfect: [http://credibility.stanford.edu/guidelines/](http://credibility.stanford.edu/guidelines/)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim P.</title>
		<link>http://www.bearfruit.org/2009/01/16/at-a-glance-credibility-link-to-content-ratio/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-237</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a personal thing... because I take a moment to glance over the links, and they look legitimate (news, events..)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a personal thing&#8230; because I take a moment to glance over the links, and they look legitimate (news, events..)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

