The Myth of Darwinism
The Myth of Darwinism: People put way too much faith in scientific dating techniques…
““In one of the most recent cases of anomalous dating, rock paintings found in the South African bush in 1991 were analysed by Oxford University’Â’s radio carbon accelerator unit who dated them as being around 1,200 years old. This finding was significant because it meant the paintings would have been the first bushman painting found in open country. However, publicity of the find attracted the attention of Mrs Joan Ahrens, a Capetown resident, who recognised the paintings as being produced by her at art classes and later stolen from her garden by vandals. The significance of incidents such as this is that mistakes can be uncovered only in those rare cases where chance grants us some external methods of checking the dating technique.”” -– Richard Milton, The Facts of Life – —Shattering the Myth of Darwinism, Fourth Estate, London, 1992, pp. 33-34.




The post above has quoted references (the image reference is a bit hard to read, it’s “Science” vol 141). So you are welcome to disagree but please, when refuting the above cases state your references instead of or along with your opinion. Thanks.
For further scientific discussions (not emotional opinions like “anonymous” posted above) see a recently published article discussing the half-life of 14C by Andrew Snelling in [Radiocarbon Ages for Fossil Ammonites and Wood in Cretaceous Strata near Redding, California](http://tinyurl.com/6zb5qd). Quite interesting material that will get you thinking.
Just dropped in to say that this is nonsense! Just in case somebody stumbles on this and believes it. Just another example of fabricated “facts” by the creationist gang!